Mel Gibson owns Local news personality realizes that he is an offended Jew
#1
Posted 19 January 2010 - 07:45 PM
http://www.deadline....-controversial/
This is a must click link. Gibson gives him the "want to start something FAGGOT" stare and this pussy looks like he is mentally operating the keypad to his panic room
#2
Posted 20 January 2010 - 07:07 PM
#3
Posted 20 January 2010 - 08:09 PM
AMIRITE GUYZ???
#4
Posted 20 January 2010 - 08:18 PM
#5
Posted 20 January 2010 - 08:36 PM
I'm going to go see Gibson's movie twice. And I'm a Protestant who refused to watch "The Passion of the Christ."
#6
Posted 20 January 2010 - 09:59 PM
PRCalDude, 20 January 2010 - 08:36 PM:
I'm going to go see Gibson's movie twice. And I'm a Protestant who refused to watch "The Passion of the Christ."
I liked Passion...it was a great slap in the face to Scorsese's jerk-off Last Temptation...also nice to see something that made an stab at historical accuracy
#8
Posted 22 January 2010 - 01:18 AM
#9
Posted 22 January 2010 - 11:16 AM
How insular is their universe when nearly every unexpected reaction is met with panic and stunned disbelief?
#11
Posted 22 January 2010 - 12:37 PM
#13
Posted 22 January 2010 - 07:35 PM
PLEASUREMAN, 22 January 2010 - 05:22 PM:
mel
The interviewer's question was obviously pre-thought out. He knew that he'd ask it before the interview, and it was an attempt to poison the public to the movie by reminding them of Gibson's statements four years ago. You would think that if a reporter hated the person he was to interview, he'd pass on the assignment, but he didn't for obvious reasons (wanting to put the boot in). Whats interesting to me is that a very Europeanish-looking guy (blue eyes, brown hair, pinkish-white skin) is so apparently ethnically-conscious. A gene-map of that reporter would probably inform him that he's at least 50% european, and probably more. I wonder if he's aware of that. He looks more like a fat Norweigan than a rabbi.
If the reporter is genuinely offended by Gibson making movies, then he should attempt to get together with other like-minded people and take out advertisements against this film, and attribute his name to that social conviction. If he fears for his employment due to that, then he should privately ask other groups (the ADL for instance) to have an ad campaign against the film and he could make a private financial contribution to that effort. What he did was a underhanded attempt at sabotage that truthfully should have got him fired (Entertainment media are supposed to not grovel before stars, but they aren't supposed to try and sabotage their sales and insult them either).
#14
Posted 05 February 2010 - 02:55 PM
#15
Posted 05 February 2010 - 04:43 PM
#16
Posted 05 February 2010 - 06:39 PM
Why don't you just get over it you smug prick, or I'll go Braveheart on your sagging lardass
asshole

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote







